Saturday, November 3, 2012

OA No. 254 OF 2010 on 13-10-2010


CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCH  :  BANGALORE

ORIGINAL APPLICATION  

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010

HON'BLE SMT. LEENA MEHENDALE   ...       MEMBER (A)

HON'BLE SHRI V. AJAY KUMAR           ...                MEMBER (J)


Sri P.U. Venkatesan,
45 years,
S/o P.V. Urappan,
Occ. Assistant Loco Pilot,
O/o Chief Crew Controller (CCRL),
Satellite Goods Terminal, White Field,
South Western Railway,
Bangalore – 560 062.
R/at No.28, 1 Stage,
1st Cross, Okalipuram,
Bangalore – 560 021                                       ...                                 Applicant

(In Person)

Vs.

1.  The Union of India,
    be representedby its General Manager,
    South Western Railway,
    Hubli – 580 020.

2.  Sri Kuldeep Chaturvedi,
    General Manager,
    South Western Railway,
    Hubli – 580 020.

3.  The Chief Operations Manager
    and Revising Authority,
    South Western Railway,
    Hubli – 580 020.

4.  Sri J.D. Goswami,
    Chief Operations Manager and
    Revising Authority,
    South Western Railway,
    Hubli – 580 020.

- 2 -

5.  The Sr. Divisional Mechanical Engineer,
    and Disciplinary Authority,
    O/o Divisional Railway Manager,
    Bangalore Division,
    South Western Railway,
    Bangalore – 560 023.

6.  Sri Mohammad Saquib,
    Sr. Divisional Mechanical Engineer and
    Disciplinary Authority,
    O/o Divisional Railway Manager,
    Bangalore Division,
    South Western Railway,
    Bangalore – 560 023.                                 

7.  Shri Emerson Doss,
    Senior Loco Inspector,
    and Inquiry Officer,
    O/o Sr. Divisional Mechanical Engineer,
    Bangalore Division, Bangalore – 560 023. ...                                 Respondents

(By Advocate Shri N.S. Prasad,
Sr. Standing Counsel for Railways)   

O R D E R - (ORAL)

Hon'ble Smt. Leena Mehendale, Member (A) :

            When the matter came up for admission today, the  applicant in person has filed a memo for withdrawal of the OA, with liberty to pursue the matter before the authorities concerned .

2.         Accordingly, the OA is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the applicant to pursue the matter before the authorities concerned .


                        (V. AJAY KUMAR)                                       (LEENA MEHENDALE)
                             MEMBER (J)                                                    MEMBER (A)


psp.

No comments:

Post a Comment